Peer Review Process

The JAHIR (Journal of Advanced Health Informatics Research) follows a rigorous editorial review and anonymous peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research. The review process consists of the following steps:

1. Editorial Review

   • The Editors conduct an initial review of the submitted manuscript to assess its suitability within the journal’s scope and adherence to the journal template.
   • During this stage, the Editors may communicate with the author(s) regarding necessary revisions or clarifications.
   • Based on this assessment, the Editors decide whether the manuscript proceeds to peer review or is declined.

2. Anonymous Peer Review

   • Manuscripts that pass the editorial review are sent to two or three independent reviewers for evaluation using a double-blind peer review method, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.
   • The peer review process evaluates aspects such as novelty, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.

3. Reviewer Recommendations

   • Reviewers provide constructive feedback and may suggest improvements, request revisions, or recommend acceptance/rejection of the manuscript.

4. Final Editorial Decision

   • The Editors consider the reviewers’ recommendations and make a final decision on whether the manuscript meets the JAHIR Journal’s quality standards for publication.
   • The Editor’s decision is final.

This structured editorial and peer review process ensures that all published articles meet high academic and ethical standards.