Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Online Submision

Already have a Username/Password for BIM?

GO TO LOGIN

Need a Username/Password?

GO TO REGISTRATION

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

 

Structure of the manuscripts.

The manuscripts should be typed in A4 (210mm x 297mm), with 12-point Times News Roman font and must be 1.5 line-spaced, except for indented quotations. The manuscript must be saved as a word file. All the pages, including tables, appendices, and references, should be serially numbered. Spell out numbers from one to ten, except when used in tables and lists, and when used with mathematical, statistical, scientific or technical units and quantities, such as distances, weights and measures. All other numbers are expressed numerically. Authors are encouraged to use the BIM’s template. A sample template is included at the end of this document.

  • Language.

The manuscript must be written in good academic English. Spelling follows Webster’s International Dictionary. To ensure an anonymous review, the authors should not identify themselves directly or indirectly in their papers. A single author should not use the word “we”. Authors for whom English is not their native language are encouraged to have their papers checked before submission for grammar and clarity. We use Grammarly to helps us eliminate language errors. Make sure that the manuscript do not have errors more than 200 and 20% of plagiarism indicators.

  • Title.

The title should be brief, short, clear, and informative which reflects the article content. The length of the title maximum of 12 words. Each word of the title should be started with a capitalized letter.

  • Author’s names and institutions.

The author’s names should be accompanied by the author’s institutions and email addresses, without any academic titles and/or job titles. International collaboration is highly encouraged.

  • Abstract.

The abstract should be a total of about 150 words maximum. The abstract should be a single paragraph and should follow the style of structured abstracts. The abstract with no references cited. Also, non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided. The abstract must contains: (a) a clear statement of the originality from the research; (b) research objective; (c) method, describe briefly the main methods or treatments applied; (d) the empirical result, summarize the article's main findings; and (e) practical implications.

  • Keywords.

Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of 5 keywords. The keywords are the key concept of the manuscript, these keywords will be used for indexing purposes. Authors also must add the JEL Classification

  • Introduction.

The introduction should briefly place the study in a broad context and highlight why it is important. It should define the purpose of the work and its significance, including specific hypotheses being tested. The current state of the research field should be reviewed carefully and key publications cited. The introduction describes a brief background of the research, the research gap, state of the arts, and objective (s). It should be written efficiently and supported by references. It should be written without numbers and/or pointers.

  • Methods.

This section describes the tools of analysis along with the data and their sources. They should be described with sufficient detail to allow others to replicate and build on published results. New methods and protocols should be described in detail while well-established methods can be briefly described and appropriately cited.

  • Result and Discussion.

This section explains the results of the study. Data should be presented in Tables or Figures when feasible. There should be no duplication of data in Tables and Figures. The discussion should be consistent and should interpret the results clearly and concisely, and their significance, supported with suitable literature. The discussion should show relevance between the result and the field of investigation and/or hypotheses.

  • Conclusions.

This section concludes and provides policy implications, if any, of the study.

  • References.

Double-check that references are in the correct format. Only those papers that are being referenced are to be included in the references section. Sources not being referenced in the text must be omitted. This section lists only the papers, books, or other types of publications referred to in the manuscript. References should be the last 10-year publication with a minimum of 80% of the journal (especially from international recognized journals). References should be listed alphabetically by the author(s) last name(s) and the year of publication. This journal uses APA style 6th edition. We strongly suggested authors to use reference management software like Mendeley, Zotero, etc., to prepare citations and the list of references.

  • Citation in text.

Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa).

 

Peer Review Process and Editorial Decision

All submitted manuscripts are read by the editorial staff. Those manuscripts evaluated by the editors to be inappropriate to the journal’s criteria are rejected promptly without any external review. Manuscripts evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to double-blind reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer’s recommendation, from among several possibilities: Rejected, requires major revision, needs minor revision, or accepted.

The editor-in-chief of the Bulletin of Innovation in Management (BIM) has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.

Review Process:

  • Author submits the manuscript
  • Editor’s evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]
  • Double-blind peer review process
  • Editor’s decision
  • Confirmation to the authors
  • Journal templates can be downloaded from the following link : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k9IegeMIvsqqrh8AF3xRPATkFYnN8p_a/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106344706192444583995&rtpof=true&sd=true

Articles

Section default policy

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.